Logo

What percent of "being a good programmer" is due to expertise in the syntax of a language(s)? Could you have mastered syntax and still be a bad programmer; or, conversely, be a great programmer with only a fundamental handle on syntax?

Last Updated: 29.06.2025 00:04

What percent of "being a good programmer" is due to expertise in the syntax of a language(s)? Could you have mastered syntax and still be a bad programmer; or, conversely, be a great programmer with only a fundamental handle on syntax?

Many years ago, my wife designed a language called MUPL - “Mary’s Universal Programming Language.”

This question appears to be about five years old.

Modern IDEs like Cursor can actually transpire MUPL to code in a lot of cases.

Why did Democrats echo that Joe Biden was greater than FDR and should be put on Mt Rushmore? Why did Democrats vote for Biden blindly in the primaries and deny he was mentally impaired? Was it the lying media, or are Democrats ignorant and gullible?

Over the last five years, knowledge of the syntax has actually become a lot less important, firstly because the tools used by programmers have got better at sorting that sort of thing out, But also because writing a lot of the boiler plate code is now done by AI assistants rather than by hand.

So virtually all the thinking is about algorithms and object structures.

MUPL allows you to mix actual statements in the programming language you’re going to write in, sequel statements, and vaguely English sentences explaining what the algorithm is going to be when when you get around to writing it.

With AI tools evolving so fast, it’s tough to keep up. Which AI coding assistant is your favorite in 2024—ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Google AI Quwen, GitHub Copilot, or something else? And what’s your bold prediction for the top tool in 2025?